That won't work either!

The huge response to Palin's referring  to the term "Blood Feud" to the shooting attack in Tuscon
is somewhat puzzling. It has opened her up to all manner of anti-semitism  rants by know it all liberal mouth breathers that claim her remarks can only be construed as an affront to Jews. (See Washington Post 01/12/2012)

Rubbish! Just another attempt for the Obama brigades and camp followers to gain some traction for their language assault when the right wing, toxic rhetoric train was derailed.

There has much speculation regarding Sarah Palin's possible candidacy for president in 2012. Rumors have even suggested an exploratory committe has been or is forming in that regard. However this may be a fools errand.

Palin was the spokesperson for the Tea Party prior to the November elections and was an effective speaker for them.
But Sarah Palin has now  become a shill for the republican establishment party and an Israeli firster. One always has to wonder which country Israeli firsters have more allegiance to. I suppose it is the one that pays the most.

Palin unforunately is by no means packing the gear to be president. If you use GW Bush as a benchmark, maybe. This woman should content herself with running for Congress, again, maybe.

So, the question remains as to why liberals and Neo-Conservative Trotskyites are giving her so much press and air time as in the Washington Post articles festooned on it's online frontpage?
Is she a diversionary tactic so you guys, the oligarchy that runs the country,  can slip someone really offensive into the Whitehouse to finish screwing up our country? Or maybe guarantee another four years of Obama. I know Wall Street would just love another four year term of free ride from an Obama administration. Although anyone of the clowns the republican party has slated as possible candidates would fill that bill nicely also.